Error
There was an error loading the page.
Converting between Mixed Numbers and Improper Fractions
This question tests the student's ability to identify equivalent fractions through spotting a fraction which is not equivalent amongst a list of otherwise equivalent fractions. It also tests the students ability to convert mixed numbers into their equivalent improper fractions. It then does the reverse and tests their ability to convert an improper fraction into an equivalent mixed number.
Metadata
-
England schools
-
England university
-
Scotland schools
Taxonomy: mathcentre
Taxonomy: Kind of activity
Taxonomy: Context
Contributors
Feedback
From users who are members of Transition to university :
![]() |
said | Should not be used | 7 years, 7 months ago |
Lauren Richards | said | Needs to be tested | 7 years, 8 months ago |
![]() |
said | Has some problems | 7 years, 8 months ago |
Elliott Fletcher | said | Has some problems | 7 years, 9 months ago |
History
Chris Graham commented 7 years, 7 months ago
I've changed the status to "should not be used", as this has been split into separate questions.
Chris Graham 7 years, 7 months ago
Gave some feedback: Should not be used
Elliott Fletcher 7 years, 8 months ago
Published this.Elliott Fletcher commented 7 years, 8 months ago
I wasn't sure if you still wanted to keep this question or not since you've split it into two seperate questions, but i thought because the content of this question is still different to that in the questions that you have created then i could just rename this question from "Equivalent Fractions" to "Converting between Mixed Numbers and Improper Fractions".
Christian Lawson-Perfect 7 years, 8 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
I'm splitting these into separate questions, so here's a checkpoint with everything together.
Lauren Richards 7 years, 8 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Christian Lawson-Perfect 7 years, 8 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Christian Lawson-Perfect 7 years, 8 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
In the advice, I don't find the justifications for parts a and b very clear at all. I'd say, for example, "318=33×16", not "1×3=3 and 6×3=18 to give 318". The latter looks like it's working backwards. Your worked solution should reproduce the steps a student could take to get to the right answer.
The formatting in the advice for part c has gone awry, with some lines centred that shouldn't be.
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Elliott Fletcher commented 7 years, 9 months ago
I think this question is really good and works well. I just noticed a few grammatical things that might need to be changed.
Main Parts
a) good
b) good
c) good, but i think you should say "reduce them down to their simplest form" instead of "reduce down to their simplest form".
d) the i and ii should be in italics as they are in part c) (maybe shouldn't be bold too).
Not entirely sure, but i think there should be full stops after each of the fractions with the gaps on them in parts c and d.
Advice
I can't tell if you have done this or not, but it might be worth checking that when you are typing the a), b), c) etc in the advice, that you are just setting the format of each of them to "heading 4" and not making them bold as well.
I think "was" should be "is" in a) and b)
I would get rid of the "and", after the semi-colon, on the fifth line of a)
In c),
I think you need to add a line of text before your definitions of improper fractions and mixed numbers, for example i would write
"A mixed number is a number consisting of an integer and a proper fraction,
I.e a number of the form
a (b)/(c) where a is an integer and b/c is a proper fraction"
In d),
in i) and ii) i would add an extra line after you say what the new numerator of the proper fraction is. I think you need to simplify the proper fraction first before combining it with the integer to form the mixed number. I would say "Therefore, the proper fraction is ...". Then simplify it and then combine the simplified proper fraction with the integer at the end. Also, i think when you give the final answer i think you should put the improper fraction that you are changing before it to make the full transformation clear, e.g 13/6 = 2 1/6.
I would also change "This is in this question" to "In this question, this is".
Otheriwise, this looks good!
Elliott Fletcher 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Chris Graham 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Chris Graham commented 7 years, 9 months ago
'Which fraction is the odd one out?"... the first, because they are one digit numbers?
I think it's too vague. "Select the fraction which is not equivilant" would be more precise, or if you want to keep the phrase because it's catchy: "Which is the odd one out? Select the fraction which is not equivilant."
In (c) and (d), include = inside the LaTeX.
In the advice you have "time(s)", because the variable round could take the value 1. You could replace this text, making use of the jme function
if
:{if(rounds=1,"time","times")}
.
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Lauren Richards 7 years, 9 months ago
Created this.Name | Status | Author | Last Modified | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Converting between Mixed Numbers and Improper Fractions | Should not be used | Lauren Richards | 20/11/2019 14:47 | |
Select the fraction not equivalent to the others - small denominators | Ready to use | Christian Lawson-Perfect | 20/11/2019 14:42 | |
Select the fraction not equivalent to the others - large denominators | Ready to use | Christian Lawson-Perfect | 20/11/2019 14:42 | |
Welche Bruchzahl ist verschieden von allen anderen? (Kleine Nenner) | Ready to use | Ulrich Görtz | 15/10/2020 07:54 | |
Welcher Bruch stimmt nicht mit den anderen überein? (Große Nenner) | Ready to use | Ulrich Görtz | 26/11/2020 10:29 | |
NG2 - Converting mixed numbers to top heavy | Ready to use | Andrew Neate | 10/04/2024 09:35 | |
NG7 - Simplify (cancel down) Fractions - top heavy | Ready to use | Andrew Neate | 10/04/2024 09:36 | |
Merryn's copy of Converting between Mixed Numbers and Improper Fractions | Ready to use | Merryn Horrocks | 08/03/2024 01:17 |
There are 26 other versions that do you not have access to.
Name | Type | Generated Value |
---|
a | integer |
8
|
||||
b | integer |
8
|
||||
c | integer |
8
|
||||
d | integer |
11
|
||||
gcd | number |
8
|
||||
ab | integer |
64
|
||||
cd | integer |
88
|
||||
f | integer |
3
|
||||
g | integer |
2
|
||||
h | integer |
15
|
||||
gcd_gh | number |
1
|
||||
g_coprime | number |
2
|
||||
h_coprime | number |
15
|
||||
num | number |
47
|
||||
l | integer |
6
|
||||
j | integer |
9
|
||||
k | integer |
13
|
||||
gcd_jk | number |
1
|
||||
j_coprime | number |
9
|
||||
k_coprime | number |
13
|
||||
num2 | number |
87
|
||||
s | integer |
26
|
||||
t | integer |
7
|
||||
rounds | integer |
3
|
||||
gap1 | integer |
5
|
||||
gcd_gap1t | number |
1
|
||||
gap1_coprime | number |
5
|
||||
t_coprime | number |
7
|
||||
x | integer |
19
|
||||
y | integer |
8
|
||||
roundx | integer |
2
|
||||
gap4 | integer |
3
|
||||
gcda | number |
1
|
||||
gcdb | number |
1
|
||||
gcd_gap4y | number |
1
|
||||
gap4_coprime | number |
3
|
||||
y_coprime | number |
8
|
Generated value: integer
- ab
Use this tab to check that this question works as expected.
Part | Test | Passed? |
---|---|---|
Gap-fill | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Gap-fill | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet | ||
Number entry | ||
Hasn't run yet |
This question is used in the following exams: