There was an error loading the page.
History and Feedback
Chris Graham 2 years, 4 months ago
This is looking good now. I would like to see the advice tabulated with columns for the word, definition and relevant example.
Christian's comment below, "I don't like how the choices are in a different order for each part", is still relevant for a couple of the gaps, which have common choices.
Christian Lawson-Perfect 2 years, 4 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
I agree with Lauren - only offer a few choices for each part.
I think we talked about this question a while ago. You could have the statements and their associated words in a list, and only pick three or four each time the question runs. It looks very forbidding at the moment.
The sentences might work better as fill-in-the-blanks.
I don't like how the choices are in a different order for each part: it makes it harder to see what the options are, and to find the word I have in mind.
In some of your "for example" sentences, you use the word in question!
Lauren Richards 2 years, 5 months ago
- There is so much information in each part with all the options that it is a little overwhelming. It might be better to chisel down the options to include only the options that you think people may get confused with. Maybe 5/6 options for each part maximum.
- I think the first sentence in the advice needs to be reworded. It's a little clumsy at the moment.
- For part a), maybe explain that 3a + 2a is simplified to 5a because you've collected like-terms.
- I feel like the "definitions" are too wordy. I actually feel like you should have a mathematical example either instead of or accompanying the word-definition. For example, for Factorisation, you have written "To put in brackets finding a common factor, this is usually the simplest form.". My thought process is that the user will be having to recognise and understand what the thing is when it is in a mathematical context rather than in a word-context. Therefore, I think you should write something like " for example 2x^2+x-3 = (2x+3)(x-1)".
- If you've included a quadratic, do you want to include a cubic as well?
Elliott Fletcher 2 years, 5 months ago
Some lines are missing a full stop at the end: i can see the BODMAS definition in the advice section and the end of the line on part b.
In the definition of formula (both in the advice and also in part f), i would change "showing" to "representing", i just think it reads a bit better.
I would also make the choices for the answer in each part variable, so that students can't just click on the same box every time they repeat the question.
But otherwise, i think everything is set out nicely.
Chris Graham 2 years, 5 months ago
This question is crying out for a different part type, or rather a variant on match choices with answers. I'll have a think about that...
As it stands I find some of the definitions a little confusing. E.g. "Tell me what... equals. i.e 5x = 30 therefore x=6" is very difficult to read as a sentance. Think dictionary entries with a mathematical twist: "To obtain the solution to a mathematical problem. For example, given $5x = 30$, to find that $x=6$.
You should use LaTeX for mathematical expressions, even in the definitions. I think for the sake of completeness, including all of the definitions again in the advice would give the student something that they could write down / copy / reference.
|Vocabulary||Needs to be tested||Aiden McCall||14/06/2017 15:29|
|Algebra vocabulary||Ready to use||Aiden McCall||20/11/2019 14:33|
|NUMBAS - Algebra vocabulary||draft||Katy Dobson||16/10/2018 09:05|
|Heather's copy of Algebra vocabulary||draft||Heather Driscoll||03/06/2019 11:52|
|Gizem's copy of Heather's copy of Algebra vocabulary||draft||Gizem Intepe||27/08/2019 02:41|
No variables have been defined in this question.
This variable doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Error in variable testing condition
There's an error in the condition you specified in the Variable testing tab. Variable values can't be generated until it's fixed.
No parts have been defined in this question.
Select a part to edit.
Test that the marking algorithm works
Check that the marking algorithm works with different sets of variables and student answers using the interface below.
Create unit tests to save expected results and to document how the algorithm should work.
There's an error which means the marking algorithm can't run:
Click on a note's name to show or hide it. Only shown notes will be included when you create a unit test.
No unit tests have been defined. Enter an answer above, select one or more notes, and click the "Create a unit test" button.
The following tests check that the question is behaving as desired.
This test has not been run yet This test produces the expected output This test does not produce the expected output
This test is not currently producing the expected result. Fix the marking algorithm to produce the expected results detailed below or, if this test is out of date, update the test to accept the current values.
One or more notes in this test are no longer defined. If these notes are no longer needed, you should delete this test.
|This note produces the expected output||Current:||
This test has not yet been run.
In order to create a variable replacement, you must define at least one variable and one other part.
|Variable||Answer to use||Must be answered?|
The variable replacements you've chosen will cause the following variables to be regenerated each time the student submits an answer to this part:
These variables have some random elements, which means they're not guaranteed to have the same value each time the student submits an answer. You should define new variables to store the random elements, so that they remain the same each time this part is marked.
This question is used in the following exam: