Loading...
Error
There was an error loading the page.
Contributors
History and Feedback
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 2 months ago
Published this.Stanislav Duris 2 years, 2 months ago
I split this question into 4 different questions numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 2 months ago
We could split each part into its own question.
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Ready to use
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
 In the statement, you do not need "is a way that", it reads fine and makes more sense without it.
 I think you should say what the large number equivalent would be for the example in the statement to make it make a link for the user. They understand what large numbers are but it is difficult to deal with them, and you showing what the large number equivalent of the example standard form will help them to understand how to use it more.
 I think you should alter the question part of a to include an example of how you would like the answer typed. I tried to type x as an * as I think many users might try, and obviously numbas didn't like that very much. If you put "Write these in standard index form (for example, a.bcd*10^n):", I think it would be clearer.
 I think you should write "the following" instead of "these" in parts a) and b), not just part c).
 I had a question in part d that technically did not follow the standard index form as A was not between 1 and 10. It was 81*10^2. If following the standard index form you had stated in the statement, it should have been 8.1*10^3.
 I think the advice for part c) could be expanded quite a bit, especially the first sentence. You haven't said what you mean by "convert".
 Minor point, but I think "Similarly" in part d) advice should have a comma after it to make it look less lonely.
 I think this is a good question!
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Aiden McCall 2 years, 2 months ago
a) and b) do not have any problems.
c)
You can input the same values in the question and get the question correct. You can fix this by making the string + and  restricted. It could also be fixed if you had a gap x 10^gap but I'm not sure if that is possible, if it were it would be a nice fix.
d) Same as above fixed by restricting the strings ( )
The below link may be useful
http://www.mathsgenie.co.uk/resources/82_standardform.pdf
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 3 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Stanislav Duris 2 years, 3 months ago
Created this as a copy of Stanislav's copy of Standard form needs to be tested.Name  Status  Author  Last Modified  

Stanislav's copy of Standard form needs to be tested  Should not be used  Stanislav Duris  22/06/2017 14:27  
Working with standard index form  Ready to use  Stanislav Duris  01/08/2017 15:01  
Converting from standard index form to decimal.  Ready to use  Stanislav Duris  20/05/2019 14:32  
Stanislav's copy of Working with standard index form 1 before all split up  Should not be used  Stanislav Duris  07/07/2017 18:00  
Addition and subtraction of numbers in standard form  Ready to use  Stanislav Duris  01/08/2017 16:13  
Multiplication and division of numbers in standard index form  Ready to use  Stanislav Duris  01/08/2017 16:17  
Multiplication and division of numbers in standard index form [L0 Randomised]  Needs to be tested  Matthew James Sykes  25/07/2018 10:21  
Katy's copy of Working with standard index form  draft  Katy Dobson  03/09/2019 08:29 
No variables have been defined in this question.
Name  Type  Generated Value  

Error in variable testing condition
There's an error in the condition you specified in the Variable testing tab. Variable values can't be generated until it's fixed.
No parts have been defined in this question.
Select a part to edit.
Ask the student a question, and give any hints about how they should answer this part.
Pattern restriction
Variables
String restrictions
Answers  

Choices 
Test that the marking algorithm works
Check that the marking algorithm works with different sets of variables and student answers using the interface below.
Create unit tests to save expected results and to document how the algorithm should work.
There's an error which means the marking algorithm can't run:
Name  Value  

Note

Value  Feedback 


Click on a note's name to show or hide it. Only shown notes will be included when you create a unit test.
Unit tests
No unit tests have been defined. Enter an answer above, select one or more notes, and click the "Create a unit test" button.
The following tests check that the question is behaving as desired.
This test has not been run yet This test produces the expected output This test does not produce the expected output
This test is not currently producing the expected result. Fix the marking algorithm to produce the expected results detailed below or, if this test is out of date, update the test to accept the current values.
One or more notes in this test are no longer defined. If these notes are no longer needed, you should delete this test.
Name  Value 

Note  Value  Feedback  

This note produces the expected output  Current: 


Expected: 

This test has not yet been run.
When you need to change the way this part works beyond the available options, you can write JavaScript code to be executed at the times described below.
To account for errors made by the student in earlier calculations, replace question variables with answers to earlier parts.
In order to create a variable replacement, you must define at least one variable and one other part.
Variable  Answer to use  Must be answered?  

The variable replacements you've chosen will cause the following variables to be regenerated each time the student submits an answer to this part:
These variables have some random elements, which means they're not guaranteed to have the same value each time the student submits an answer. You should define new variables to store the random elements, so that they remain the same each time this part is marked.
to
This question is used in the following exams:
 Powers and indices by Christian LawsonPerfect in Transition to university.
 maths practicerevision by David Martin in David's workspace.
 Hazel Test Exam 1 by Hazel Corradi in Hazel's workspace.
 Powers and indices by Angus Rosenburgh in Angus's workspace.
 Powers and indices with functions by Mark Hodds in Tutoring.
 Eva's copy of Powers and indices by Eva Szatmari in Eva's workspace.
 Blathnaid's copy of Eva's copy of Powers and indices by Blathnaid Sheridan in Blathnaid's workspace.
 Huuuuuge test by Angus Rosenburgh in Angus's workspace.
 Nick's copy of Powers and indices by Nick Walker in Nick's workspace.
 Powers and indices [L0 Randomised] by Matthew James Sykes in CHY1205.
 PRELECTURE SKILLS by Matthew James Sykes in CHY1205.
 NUMBAS Powers and indices by Katy Dobson in Katy's workspace.
 MATH1901 Arithmetic & Basic Algebra by Blathnaid Sheridan in Blathnaid's workspace.
 Miscellaneous by Mario Orsi in Mario's workspace.
 Maria's copy of Powers and indices by Maria Aneiros in Maria's workspace.