Loading...
Error
There was an error loading the page.
Taxonomy:
Contributors
History and Feedback
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 1 month ago
Gave some feedback: Ready to use
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 1 month ago
Saved a checkpoint:
Changed the storm to an electrical fault, so it's more plausibly instantaneous.
Improved some of the wording in the advice.
Chris Graham 2 years, 1 month ago
I've changed the wording to be, I think, clearer. I've not marked it ready to use, as I would be grateful for a second opinion.
Elliott Fletcher 2 years, 1 month ago
Published this.Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
I have made the changes you suggested and made sure the LCM will not be either of the given numbers.
Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Christian LawsonPerfect 2 years, 2 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
Part a is a bit too simple for an incoming university student.
This question should focus just on calculating least common multiples. Remove part a, leaving the nice wordy question. You could have another very simple separate question asking to find the LCM of two numbers when:
 they're coprime;
 their GCD is bigger than 1 but not equal to either number;
 one is a multiple of the other.
I think it should be "platform A" instead of "track A".
I got periods of 12 and 6 minutes for the two platforms  could you make sure that the LCM isn't either of the given numbers?
Bradley Bush 2 years, 2 months ago
Good concise question, just a few notes:
 Could the statement be a more formal definition of a multiple followed by what you've already written as a way of thinking of it?
 The first part was really straight forward although it made me feel guilty for not instantly remembering my $16$ times tables.
 For the second part, I think that you need to either make it clear that a train needs to be present on exactly the same minute to clash or maybe think of a different example so that using multiples makes more sense. I.E. if the trains were stopping 1 minute apart, surely they would clash too?
 Maybe you could phrase the question in an alternate reailty where there has yet to be a storm and both tracks are working then just ask for the time when there is a train on both tracks? I'm struggling to be very imaginative here.
 In the advice, it might be good to hint to the fact you are caling lowest common multiples LCM before you start using it by in the first instance of saying lowest common multiples just putting lowest common multiples (LCM) for reference?
Other than that, great question, I learned some times tables :)
Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Lauren Richards 2 years, 2 months ago
Created this.There is only one version of this question.
No variables have been defined in this question.
Name  Type  Generated Value  

Error in variable testing condition
There's an error in the condition you specified in the Variable testing tab. Variable values can't be generated until it's fixed.
No parts have been defined in this question.
Select a part to edit.
Ask the student a question, and give any hints about how they should answer this part.
Pattern restriction
Variables
String restrictions
Answers  

Choices 
Test that the marking algorithm works
Check that the marking algorithm works with different sets of variables and student answers using the interface below.
Create unit tests to save expected results and to document how the algorithm should work.
There's an error which means the marking algorithm can't run:
Name  Value  

Note

Value  Feedback 


Click on a note's name to show or hide it. Only shown notes will be included when you create a unit test.
Unit tests
No unit tests have been defined. Enter an answer above, select one or more notes, and click the "Create a unit test" button.
The following tests check that the question is behaving as desired.
This test has not been run yet This test produces the expected output This test does not produce the expected output
This test is not currently producing the expected result. Fix the marking algorithm to produce the expected results detailed below or, if this test is out of date, update the test to accept the current values.
One or more notes in this test are no longer defined. If these notes are no longer needed, you should delete this test.
Name  Value 

Note  Value  Feedback  

This note produces the expected output  Current: 


Expected: 

This test has not yet been run.
When you need to change the way this part works beyond the available options, you can write JavaScript code to be executed at the times described below.
To account for errors made by the student in earlier calculations, replace question variables with answers to earlier parts.
In order to create a variable replacement, you must define at least one variable and one other part.
Variable  Answer to use  Must be answered?  

The variable replacements you've chosen will cause the following variables to be regenerated each time the student submits an answer to this part:
These variables have some random elements, which means they're not guaranteed to have the same value each time the student submits an answer. You should define new variables to store the random elements, so that they remain the same each time this part is marked.
to
This question is used in the following exams:
 trial run by Lesley Davis in Lesley's workspace.
 Divisibility and factors of integers by Christian LawsonPerfect in Transition to university.
 maths practicerevision by David Martin in David's workspace.
 Nick's copy of Divisibility and factors of integers by Nick Walker in Nick's workspace.
 Blathnaid's copy of Nick's copy of Divisibility and factors of integers by Blathnaid Sheridan in Blathnaid's workspace.
 Foundation Maths Test 1 by Paul Molloy in Paul's workspace.
 Divisibility and factors of integers by Simon Thomas in Foundation mathematics.