There was an error loading the page.
From users who are members of Transition to university :
|Christian Lawson-Perfect||said||Ready to use||3 years, 10 months ago|
|Lauren Richards||said||Needs to be tested||3 years, 11 months ago|
From users who are not members of Transition to university :
|francisco Glezortiz||said||Ready to use||8 months, 1 week ago|
Christian Lawson-Perfect 3 years, 11 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
Part a is a bit too simple for an incoming university student.
This question should focus just on calculating least common multiples. Remove part a, leaving the nice wordy question. You could have another very simple separate question asking to find the LCM of two numbers when:
- they're coprime;
- their GCD is bigger than 1 but not equal to either number;
- one is a multiple of the other.
I think it should be "platform A" instead of "track A".
I got periods of 12 and 6 minutes for the two platforms - could you make sure that the LCM isn't either of the given numbers?
Bradley Bush 3 years, 11 months ago
Good concise question, just a few notes:
- Could the statement be a more formal definition of a multiple followed by what you've already written as a way of thinking of it?
- The first part was really straight forward although it made me feel guilty for not instantly remembering my $16$ times tables.
- For the second part, I think that you need to either make it clear that a train needs to be present on exactly the same minute to clash or maybe think of a different example so that using multiples makes more sense. I.E. if the trains were stopping 1 minute apart, surely they would clash too?
- Maybe you could phrase the question in an alternate reailty where there has yet to be a storm and both tracks are working then just ask for the time when there is a train on both tracks? I'm struggling to be very imaginative here.
- In the advice, it might be good to hint to the fact you are caling lowest common multiples LCM before you start using it by in the first instance of saying lowest common multiples just putting lowest common multiples (LCM) for reference?
Other than that, great question, I learned some times tables :)
|Lowest common multiples: train timetable example||Ready to use||Lauren Richards||12/10/2020 07:31|
|Lowest common multiples: train timetable example||Ready to use||John Ian Keng||28/06/2020 09:42|
|Horario de trenes||Ready to use||francisco Glezortiz||12/10/2020 15:42|
|Horario de trenes||draft||francisco Glezortiz||12/10/2020 16:03|
No variables have been defined in this question.
This variable doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Error in variable testing condition
There's an error in the condition you specified in the Variable testing tab. Variable values can't be generated until it's fixed.
No parts have been defined in this question.
Select a part to edit.
For each combination of answer and choice, specify the number of marks to add or subtract when the student picks it.
For each combination of answer and choice, write 1 if the student should tick it, or 0 if they should leave it unticked.
Test that the marking algorithm works
Check that the marking algorithm works with different sets of variables and student answers using the interface below.
Create unit tests to save expected results and to document how the algorithm should work.
There's an error which means the marking algorithm can't run:
These variables are available within the marking algorithm.
These values are available as extra variables in the marking algorithm.
These values are available as entries in the
Click on a note's name to show or hide it. Only shown notes will be included when you create a unit test.
No unit tests have been defined. Enter an answer above, select one or more notes, and click the "Create a unit test" button.
The following tests check that the question is behaving as desired.
This test has not been run yet This test produces the expected output This test does not produce the expected output
This test is not currently producing the expected result. Fix the marking algorithm to produce the expected results detailed below or, if this test is out of date, update the test to accept the current values.
One or more notes in this test are no longer defined. If these notes are no longer needed, you should delete this test.
|This note produces the expected output||Current:||
This test has not yet been run.
In order to create a variable replacement, you must define at least one variable and one other part.
|Variable||Answer to use||Must be answered?|
The variable replacements you've chosen will cause the following variables to be regenerated each time the student submits an answer to this part:
These variables have some random elements, which means they're not guaranteed to have the same value each time the student submits an answer. You should define new variables to store the random elements, so that they remain the same each time this part is marked.
This part can't be reached by the student.
Add a "next part" reference to this part from another part.
None of the parts which can lead to this part are reachable either.
Next part options
Variable replacementsNo variable replacements have been defined for this next part option.
This part can follow on from:
This part doesn't follow on from any others.
There was an error loading this extension.
- : of
This question is used in the following exams:
- trial run by Lesley Davis in Lesley's workspace.
- Divisibility and factors of integers by Christian Lawson-Perfect in Transition to university.
- maths practice-revision by David Martin in David's workspace.
- Nick's copy of Divisibility and factors of integers by Nick Walker in Nick's workspace.
- Blathnaid's copy of Nick's copy of Divisibility and factors of integers by Blathnaid Sheridan in Blathnaid's workspace.
- Foundation Maths Test 1 by Paul Molloy in Paul's workspace.
- Divisibility and factors of integers by Simon Thomas in Foundation mathematics.
- ALG Divisibilidad y teo del residuo by David Vanegas in Algebra.
- MATH1901 (Paul&Laura) by Blathnaid Sheridan in Blathnaid's workspace.