Error
There was an error loading the page.
NA LANTITE data T/F questions (5)
Has some problems
Used for LANTITE preparation (Australia). NA = Number & Algebra strand. Students are asked two true/false questions based on a table of data about the LANTITE test. The pair of true/false questions are randomly selected from a pool of five pairs of questions.
Metadata
-
England schools
-
England university
-
Scotland schools
Taxonomy: mathcentre
Taxonomy: Kind of activity
Taxonomy: Context
Contributors
Feedback
From users who are members of Odds and Ends :
| Adelle Colbourn | said | Ready to use | 4 years, 7 months ago |
From users who are not members of Odds and Ends :
Ben Brawn
|
said | Has some problems | 2 years, 3 months ago |
History
Ben Brawn commented 2 years, 3 months ago
I feel that the statements such as "In 2017 there were 21 516 students who met the standard in the Literacy test" should actually say "In 2017 there were 21 516 first time candidates who met the standard in the Literacy test". There may be more statements with this issue.
Ben Brawn 2 years, 3 months ago
Gave some feedback: Has some problems
Adelle Colbourn 4 years, 5 months ago
Published this.Adelle Colbourn 4 years, 7 months ago
Gave some feedback: Ready to use
Adelle Colbourn 4 years, 8 months ago
Gave some feedback: Needs to be tested
Adelle Colbourn 4 years, 8 months ago
Created this as a copy of SP Comfort zone (5).| Name | Status | Author | Last Modified | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP Australian Health vs OECD average (6) | Ready to use | Adelle Colbourn | 24/04/2023 02:35 | |
| MG Reading a bus timetable (7) | Ready to use | Adelle Colbourn | 30/11/2021 04:35 | |
| SP Comfort zone (5) | Ready to use | Adelle Colbourn | 15/11/2023 23:35 | |
| NA LANTITE data T/F questions (5) | Has some problems | Adelle Colbourn | 15/11/2023 23:35 |
There are 8 other versions that do you not have access to.
| Name | Type | Generated Value |
|---|
| scenarios | list |
List of 5 items
|
||||
| scenario | dict |
Dictionary with 8 entries
|
||||
| prompt1 | string |
The proportion of test candida
|
||||
| prompt2 | string |
In 2016 there were 628 student
|
||||
| correct1 | string |
True
|
||||
| correct2 | string |
True
|
||||
| wrong1 | string |
False
|
||||
| wrong2 | string |
False
|
||||
| explanation1 | string |
The numbers in the % met the s
|
||||
| explanation2 | string |
In 2016, 95.2% of the 13 083 c
|
Generated value: list
[ [ "question1": safe("A smaller percentage of students met the standard for Literacy in 2018 than in 2016."), "answer1": safe("True"), "distractor1": safe("False"), "advice1": safe("90.4% of students met the standard for Literacy in 2018 whereas 95.2% of students met the standard for Literacy in 2016.
Therefore the statement is true."), "question2": safe("Fewer students met the standard for Numeracy in 2018 than in 2016."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 90% of the 22 011 students met the standard for Numeracy. 90% of 22 011 = 19 810 students.
In 2016, 94.2% of the 13 084 students met the standard for Numeracy. 94.2% of 13 084 = 12 325 students.
So while a lower percentage of students met the standard in 2018, there were more students who met the standard in 2018, because there were many more test candidates.
Therefore the statement is false.") ], [ "question1": safe("The number of test candidates for each test has steadily increased over time."), "answer1": safe("False"), "distractor1": safe("True"), "advice1": safe("The numbers in the Total test candidates column increased in 2017 compared to 2016 for both tests.
However, they then decreased in 2018 compared to 2017.
Therefore this statement is false."), "question2": safe("In 2017 there were 21 516 students who met the standard in the Literacy test."), "answer2": safe("True"), "distractor2": safe("False"), "advice2": safe("In 2017, 92% of the 23 387 candidates met the standard in the Literacy test.
92% of 23 387 = 21 516.
Therefore this statement is true.") ], [ "question1": safe("The year which had the most similar number of test candidates for both papers was 2016."), "answer1": safe("True"), "distractor1": safe("False"), "advice1": safe("This statement is true, as the number of test candidates in 2016 for each test differs only by 1."), "question2": safe("In 2018 there were 19 810 students who did not meet the standard in the Numeracy test."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 90% of the 22 011 candidates met the standard in the Numeracy test.
This means that 10% of the candidates did NOT meet the standard.
10% of 22 011 = 2 201.
Therefore this statement is false.") ], [ "question1": safe("The proportion of test candidates who met the standard for each test has steadily decreased over time."), "answer1": safe("True"), "distractor1": safe("False"), "advice1": safe("The numbers in the % met the standard column decreased between 2016 and 2017 for both tests, then again between 2017 and 2018 for both tests.
Therefore this statement is true."), "question2": safe("In 2016 there were 628 students who did not meet the standard in the Literacy test."), "answer2": safe("True"), "distractor2": safe("False"), "advice2": safe("In 2016, 95.2% of the 13 083 candidates met the standard in the Literacy test.
This means that 4.8% of the candidates did NOT meet the standard.
4.8% of 13 083 = 628.
Therefore this statement is true.") ], [ "question1": safe("A larger percentage of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2017 than in 2016."), "answer1": safe("False"), "distractor1": safe("True"), "advice1": safe("92.3% of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2017 whereas 94.2% of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2016.
Therefore the statement is false."), "question2": safe("In 2018, 55 more students met the standard in the Literacy test than in the Numeracy test."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 19 948 students met the standard in the Literacy test (90.4% of 22 066).
In 2018, 19 810 students met the standard in the Numeracy test (90% of 22 011).
The difference between these numbers is 19 948 - 19 810 = 138.
Therefore the statement is false.") ] ]
Therefore the statement is true."), "question2": safe("Fewer students met the standard for Numeracy in 2018 than in 2016."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 90% of the 22 011 students met the standard for Numeracy. 90% of 22 011 = 19 810 students.
In 2016, 94.2% of the 13 084 students met the standard for Numeracy. 94.2% of 13 084 = 12 325 students.
So while a lower percentage of students met the standard in 2018, there were more students who met the standard in 2018, because there were many more test candidates.
Therefore the statement is false.") ], [ "question1": safe("The number of test candidates for each test has steadily increased over time."), "answer1": safe("False"), "distractor1": safe("True"), "advice1": safe("The numbers in the Total test candidates column increased in 2017 compared to 2016 for both tests.
However, they then decreased in 2018 compared to 2017.
Therefore this statement is false."), "question2": safe("In 2017 there were 21 516 students who met the standard in the Literacy test."), "answer2": safe("True"), "distractor2": safe("False"), "advice2": safe("In 2017, 92% of the 23 387 candidates met the standard in the Literacy test.
92% of 23 387 = 21 516.
Therefore this statement is true.") ], [ "question1": safe("The year which had the most similar number of test candidates for both papers was 2016."), "answer1": safe("True"), "distractor1": safe("False"), "advice1": safe("This statement is true, as the number of test candidates in 2016 for each test differs only by 1."), "question2": safe("In 2018 there were 19 810 students who did not meet the standard in the Numeracy test."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 90% of the 22 011 candidates met the standard in the Numeracy test.
This means that 10% of the candidates did NOT meet the standard.
10% of 22 011 = 2 201.
Therefore this statement is false.") ], [ "question1": safe("The proportion of test candidates who met the standard for each test has steadily decreased over time."), "answer1": safe("True"), "distractor1": safe("False"), "advice1": safe("The numbers in the % met the standard column decreased between 2016 and 2017 for both tests, then again between 2017 and 2018 for both tests.
Therefore this statement is true."), "question2": safe("In 2016 there were 628 students who did not meet the standard in the Literacy test."), "answer2": safe("True"), "distractor2": safe("False"), "advice2": safe("In 2016, 95.2% of the 13 083 candidates met the standard in the Literacy test.
This means that 4.8% of the candidates did NOT meet the standard.
4.8% of 13 083 = 628.
Therefore this statement is true.") ], [ "question1": safe("A larger percentage of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2017 than in 2016."), "answer1": safe("False"), "distractor1": safe("True"), "advice1": safe("92.3% of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2017 whereas 94.2% of students met the standard for Numeracy in 2016.
Therefore the statement is false."), "question2": safe("In 2018, 55 more students met the standard in the Literacy test than in the Numeracy test."), "answer2": safe("False"), "distractor2": safe("True"), "advice2": safe("In 2018, 19 948 students met the standard in the Literacy test (90.4% of 22 066).
In 2018, 19 810 students met the standard in the Numeracy test (90% of 22 011).
The difference between these numbers is 19 948 - 19 810 = 138.
Therefore the statement is false.") ] ]
This variable doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Use this tab to check that this question works as expected.
| Part | Test | Passed? |
|---|---|---|
| Choose one from a list | ||
| Hasn't run yet | ||
| Choose one from a list | ||
| Hasn't run yet |
This question is used in the following exams: