There was an error loading the page.
From users who are members of Transition to university :
|Chris Graham||said||Ready to use||3 years, 1 month ago|
|Christian Lawson-Perfect||said||Ready to use||3 years, 1 month ago|
|Bradley Bush||said||Needs to be tested||3 years, 2 months ago|
From users who are not members of Transition to university :
|Christopher boyd||said||Ready to use||2 years, 8 months ago|
Chris Graham 3 years, 1 month ago
This was a bit of a mess, as the points A and B had originally been illogically ordered, and this had only been half fixed.
Part a) had mathematical expression gaps which should have been number entry, and I have added fractionNumbers simplification in the advice and displayed answer.
I've adjusted the axis ranges so that the intercept is always on the grid.
Aiden McCall 3 years, 2 months ago
Saved a checkpoint:
I have edited the main and advice to make sense and tweaked parts. There is a problem with the question that where you put y = mx +c you can write m in the gap fill and even when restricting the string it shows what m is on the graph so you can effectively 'cheat' this also works in the same way if you type in c. I cannot think of a way to fix this without the JSXgraph code and I don't know where abouts that is.
Chris Graham 3 years, 2 months ago
Similar points to our earlier discussion:
This is a candidate for using the Numbas variables to set the jsxgraph axis limits. Move the block of code where you grab the Numbas variables in front of making the board, so that you have access to them. And then you can use them in the bounding box definition
boundingBox:[yb-2,...]or whatever is sensible. Don't forget you'll want the intercept to be on the board.
Since you are only asking for the equation of the straight line through the points, you might consider creating a step with gapfills for the gradient and intercept, to allow the student to break the question down.
And you could add a second plot with the solution to the advice.
One final thing: on one run I had B at the origin. You may wish to avoid this as it makes parts of the advice obsolete.
No variables have been defined in this question.
This variable doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Error in variable testing condition
There's an error in the condition you specified in the Variable testing tab. Variable values can't be generated until it's fixed.
No parts have been defined in this question.
Select a part to edit.
Test that the marking algorithm works
Check that the marking algorithm works with different sets of variables and student answers using the interface below.
Create unit tests to save expected results and to document how the algorithm should work.
There's an error which means the marking algorithm can't run:
Click on a note's name to show or hide it. Only shown notes will be included when you create a unit test.
No unit tests have been defined. Enter an answer above, select one or more notes, and click the "Create a unit test" button.
The following tests check that the question is behaving as desired.
This test has not been run yet This test produces the expected output This test does not produce the expected output
This test is not currently producing the expected result. Fix the marking algorithm to produce the expected results detailed below or, if this test is out of date, update the test to accept the current values.
One or more notes in this test are no longer defined. If these notes are no longer needed, you should delete this test.
|This note produces the expected output||Current:||
This test has not yet been run.
In order to create a variable replacement, you must define at least one variable and one other part.
|Variable||Answer to use||Must be answered?|
The variable replacements you've chosen will cause the following variables to be regenerated each time the student submits an answer to this part:
These variables have some random elements, which means they're not guaranteed to have the same value each time the student submits an answer. You should define new variables to store the random elements, so that they remain the same each time this part is marked.
This part can't be reached by the student.
Add a "next part" reference to this part from another part.
None of the parts which can lead to this part are reachable either.
Next part options
Variable replacementsNo variable replacements have been defined for this next part option.
This part can follow on from:
This part doesn't follow on from any others.
This question is used in the following exams:
- my test by Chris Graham in Chris's workspace.
- Find the equation of a line through two points by Christian Lawson-Perfect in Transition to university.
- maths practice-revision by David Martin in David's workspace.
- Numbas Workshop by Caitríona Ní Shé in Caitríona's workspace.
- Find the equation of a line through two points by Angus Rosenburgh in Angus's workspace.
- Introductory Maths for analytical chemistry by aine whelan in aine's workspace.
- Alex 1st exam by Alessandro Ottazzi in Alessandro's workspace.
- första lilla test-test by Ida Landgärds in Test projekt .
- Test1 by Joan Lewis in Joan's workspace.
- Huuuuuge test by Angus Rosenburgh in Angus's workspace.
- Find the equation of a line through two points [L3 Randomised] by Matthew James Sykes in CHY1205.
- NUMBAS- Find the equation of a line through two points by Katy Dobson in Katy's workspace.
- JP by Julie Crowley in JP.
- Year 10 Practice Exam 1 by Neil Anderson in Neil's workspace.
- Test Exam 1 by Kevin Bohan in Kevin's workspace.
- test1 by Justin McGuinness in Justin's workspace.
- test1 by Justin McGuinness in Justin's workspace.
- Offer Holder Day by Chris Graham in Chris's workspace.
- Preliminary Mathematics Advanced Assessment Task 1 by Joanna Rankins in Joanna's workspace.
- Preliminary Advanced Mathematics Assessment Task by Joanna Rankins in Joanna's workspace.
- Construction Engineering Outcome 3 by Sandra Ferguson in Sandra's workspace.
- Simon's copy of Practice for year 1 by Simon Vaughan in PA1710.
- MEM23004A by Mykola Kyrylenko in Mykola's workspace.